Outputs
Outputs
Use the filter below to find what you're looking for:
Supporting effective commissioning in healthcare: Clinical Commissioning Groups, specialised services, and next steps for CSUs
Accountability in the UK Healthcare System: An Overview
Peckham S (2014). Healthcare Policy.
Moving Services out of hospital: Joining up General Practice and community services?
This report summarises the findings of a rapid review undertaken by PRUComm of the available evidence of what factors should be taken into account in planning for the closer working of primary and community health/care services in order to increase the scope of services provided outside of hospitals.
Which features of primary care affect unscheduled secondary care use? A systematic review
Huntley, A., Lasserson, D., Wye, L., Morris, R., Checkland, K., England, H., Salisbury, C. & Purdy, S (2014). BMJ Open, 4(5). DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004746
Clinical Commissioning Groups: One year on
In April 2013 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) took over responsibility for £65 billion of the NHS budget. One year on, the seminar reflected on progress made by CCGs during their first year in operation, and discussed key issues for their future development.
Leadership in the NHS: does the Emperor have any clothes?
Checkland, K (2014). Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 19(4), 253-256. DOI:10.1177/1355819614529101
Exploring the ongoing development and impact of Clinical Commissioning Groups
The over-arching aim of the second phase of this project is to explore the impacts of CCGs, with a particular focus upon the potential added value that clinicians bring to the commissioning process (in its widest sense), and to elucidate the contexts and factors that enable or inhibit the delivery of these benefits.
PHOENIX: Public Health and Obesity in England – the New Infrastructure Examined – First interim report: the scoping review
The PHOENIX project aims to examine the impact of structural changes to the health and care system in England on the functioning of the public health system, and on the approaches taken to improving the public’s health.
Local histories and local sensemaking: a case of policy implementation in the English National Health Service
Coleman A, Checkland K, & Harrison S. (2014). In Michael Hill (Ed.), Studying Public Policy: An international approach. (pp. 209-220). Bristol: Policy Press.
Health and Wellbeing Boards: a new type of partnership?
We examined issues and the early development of HWBs in our recently published article in Local Government Studies.
Joining it up? Health and Wellbeing in the new English National Health Service organisation: Early evidence from Clinical Commissioning Groups and shadow Health and Wellbeing Boards
Coleman A, Checkland K, Segar I, McDermott I, Harrison S and Peckham S (2014). Local Government Studies, 40(4), 560-580. DOI:10.1080/03003930.2013.841578
Accountable to whom, for what? An exploration of the early development of Clinical Commissioning Groups in the English NHS
Checkland K, Allen P, Segar J, Coleman A, McDermott I, Harrison S, Petsoulas C and Peckham S (2013). BMJ Open, 3, e003769. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003769
Primary care-led commissioning: applying lessons from the past to the early development of clinical commissioning groups in England
Checkland K, Coleman A, McDermott I, Segar J, Miller R, Pestoulas C, Wallace A, Harrison S, Peckham S and Osipovic D (2013). British Journal of General Practice 63(614), e611-e619.
The use of financial incentives to help improve health outcomes: is the quality and outcomes framework fit for purpose? A systematic review
Langdown C, and Peckham S. (2013). Journal of Public Health. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt077.
Divergence of NHS choice policy in the UK: What difference has patient choice policy in England made
Sanderson M, Allen P, Peckham S et al (2013). Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 18(4), 202-208.